Within the video presentation above, Dr. Peter McCullough, a extremely credentialed and revealed heart specialist, internist and epidemiologist, and one of many main physicians main the cost to offer commonsense scientific knowledge into COVID remedies, explains what the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is and the way it harms human biology — whether or not it comes from a pure SARS-CoV-2 an infection or a COVID jab.
The presentation was given on the Burleson, Texas, COVID Symposium: A Authorized Perspective, which streamed reside December 3, 2021. He begins by addressing the need for security every time a brand new biologic product is launched. Security just isn’t one thing we are able to merely ignore, it doesn’t matter what else is at stake. We should demand that no matter we’re given truly meets some sort of security commonplace.
Warning bells began ringing in McCullough’s ears in the summertime of 2020, lengthy earlier than the COVID pictures had been rolled out. “I used to be telling lawmakers that we’ve acquired an issue,” McCullough says, as a result of corners had been being lower that may lead to a harmful product. Security research, for instance, had been truncated all the way down to a mere two months, which doesn’t enable for satisfactory analysis.
Why Did They Use Spike Protein?
He additionally had a number of different issues concerning the growth program. Notably, the pictures had been based mostly on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which by then we already realized is probably the most pathogenic a part of the virus, liable for the worst signs of COVID-19, such because the irregular blood clotting seen in severely sick sufferers.
As defined by McCullough, the virus may be illustrated as a ball with spike-like protrusions on its floor. These spikes are what’s inflicting the issues.
“That they had been genetically altered and engineered in a lab in Wuhan, China” McCullough says, “to be notably infectious, and to be notably harmful once they get into the human physique.
The very last thing you need in your physique is a type of [spike proteins], not to mention billions of them as a result of [they] injury the mind, they injury the center, they injury bone marrow, they will tear up platelets and purple blood cells. Very importantly, they injury blood vessels and trigger blood clotting.”
Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA pictures, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic materials into your physique that packages your cells to begin producing the spike protein. They’re gene switch applied sciences.
Briefly, the pictures instruct your physique to provide a harmful protein inside its personal tissues. “We’ve by no means executed that earlier than within the historical past of drugs,” McCullough says, and for good purpose: It’s a foul thought. “It’s nearly like a science fiction story going dangerous,” he says.
The concept is that by making your physique produce this damaging spike protein, your physique will react and combat it off, thereby creating immunity. Nonetheless, within the course of, the spike protein can do near-incomprehensible injury. In some folks, the spike protein is deadly.
Uncontrolled Spike Protein Manufacturing
What’s extra, we now have uncontrolled manufacturing of spike protein, each when it comes to amount and time. The Might 2021 paper,1 “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected within the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients,” proved the spike protein circulated within the blood stream for a mean of 15 days’ post-injection. The longest was 29 days.
This refuted the declare that the mRNA merely stayed within the arm and didn’t flow into out of the injection web site. Logically, that declare doesn’t make a lot sense, and the Japanese authorities, early on, demanded Pfizer do a examine to point out them the place the injected mRNA truly goes.
Pfizer did that biodistribution examine,2 which confirmed each the mRNA and spike protein had been extensively distributed in animals’ our bodies. Specifically, it was discovered to build up within the ovaries. Regardless of that, the Pfizer biodistribution information package deal reveals reproductive toxicology research had been eradicated within the curiosity of velocity.
June 25, 2021, a paper was posted on the preprint server BioRxiv, exhibiting the S1 portion of the spike protein stays detectable for as much as 15 months after you get well from COVID-19.
“No surprise folks have long-COVID syndrome,” McCullough says. “The physique is making an attempt to wash out this spike protein that’s not imagined to be there, 15 months after you’ve had the an infection.”
McCullough factors out that Bruce Patterson, the Stanford scientist who led that examine, additionally continues to seek out the entire spike protein — each the S1 and S2 segments — in sufferers who acquired the COVID jab, months post-injection.
So, as of proper now, we don’t know when the spike protein manufacturing ceases. What we do know, with nice certainty, is that the spike protein damages the human physique and contributes to each acute and power well being situations and ailments.
Australia has already bought 14 doses of the COVID jabs for each particular person. That is meant to cowl them for seven years, at one dose each six months. As famous by McCullough, some folks merely aren’t going to outlive that sort of steady and ever-increasing onslaught of spike protein.
Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security
Clear hazard alerts had been obvious in April 2021, and Might 24, 2021, McCullough revealed a paper together with 56 different worldwide scientists within the journal Authorea.3
The paper, “SARS-CoV-2 Mass Vaccination: Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security that Demand Solutions from Worldwide Well being Businesses, Regulatory Authorities, Governments and Vaccine Builders,” demanded the injections be pulled from the market except or till security issues are addressed. Key scientific issues raised embody:
The doubtless hazardous mechanisms of motion of the pictures leading to cell, tissue and organ injury
The presence of dangerous spike protein in donated blood
Lack of genotoxicity, teratogenicity and oncogenicity research
The results of bioaccumulation in girls’s ovaries
The potential for diminished fertility
The shortage of a knowledge and security monitoring board (DSMB) to supervise scientific trials and post-market surveillance
The shortage of human ethics committee to supervise scientific trials
The shortage of restrictions on exempted teams from randomized managed trials (RCTs) reminiscent of pregnant girls, girls of childbearing potential, COVID survivors (beforehand immune)
The shortage of danger stratification for hospitalization and demise within the scientific trials
The shortage of knowledge transparency
The shortage of public danger mitigation (early and at-home therapy choices)
The paper was despatched to each well being and regulatory company on this planet. Right here we’re in early 2022 and, effectively, you possibly can see what the response was. It’s been nonexistent.
A Important Appraisal of VAERS
In October 2021, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., with the Institute for Pure and Utilized Information in Israel, revealed a report within the Science, Public Well being Coverage, and the Regulation journal.4 The report, “Important Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the US Vaccine Antagonistic Occasion Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” particulars three main issues discovered:
- Deleted hostile occasion studies involving COVID jab accidents
- Delayed entry of studies
- Recoding of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Actions (MeDRA) phrases from extreme to gentle
It additionally consists of bar plots exhibiting the intense distinction between the COVID pictures in comparison with all different vaccines in the marketplace. If the pictures had been secure, the variety of VAERS studies would stay comparatively regular, not various a lot from earlier years, however what we see is a staggering spike in vaccine accidents reported in 2021.
The common variety of hostile occasion studies following vaccination for the previous 10 years has been about 39,000 yearly, with a mean of 155 deaths. That’s for all obtainable vaccines mixed.
The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 hostile occasions in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, together with 9,476 deaths. In case you embody worldwide studies that make their manner into the VAERS system, we’re 983,756 hostile occasion studies and 20,622 deaths.5
As staggering as these numbers are, they’re simply the tip of the iceberg. If you add within the underreporting issue, which is believed to be wherever from 5 to 40, the numbers are merely astronomical.
VAERS is an early warning system and is meant to alert our authorities to probably hazardous vaccines as soon as they’ve been rolled out. The sign from VAERS is so clear there’s merely little doubt we now have a security downside on our fingers.
Can COVID Pictures Trigger Demise?
As famous by McCullough, there’s a really tight temporality to the pictures in most deaths. Half have occurred inside 48 hours of injection, and 80% have died inside one week of their jab (be it the primary, second or third dose).6
Temporality is among the 10 Bradford Hill standards used to ascertain causal relationship. As a way to be causative, one occasion should happen earlier than one other, and the shorter the period between the 2 occasions, the upper the chance of a causative impact.
In June 2021, Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., on the College of London revealed an evaluation7 of VAERS demise studies concluding that 86% of post-jab deaths may very well be attributed to the pictures. There was no different clarification for the deaths. McLachlan additionally checked out who’s getting killed by the pictures and, sadly, it’s the identical folks the pictures are meant to guard — our seniors.
In September 2021, Ronald Kostoff, Ph.D., revealed a report8 that additionally confirmed seniors had been dying from the jab at far greater charges than different age teams. As famous by McCullough, this makes good sense as a result of folks die from COVID-19 as a result of impression of the spike protein. Why would anybody assume they may survive having it produced in their very own our bodies?
Utilizing the best-case state of affairs cost-benefit evaluation, Kostoff estimates that individuals aged 65 and older are 5 occasions extra more likely to die of the COVID shot than from COVID-19 itself.
The rationale for it is because when you take the shot, you’re assured to be uncovered to its dangers, however you’re not assured to get COVID-19 when you don’t take the shot. It’s possible you’ll be uncovered, or you could not. And never everybody develops a extreme an infection even when instantly uncovered.
COVID Jab-Related Myocarditis in Youngsters
In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an evaluation9 of VAERS information on the preprint server medRxiv, exhibiting that greater than 86% of the youngsters aged 12 to 17 who reported signs of myocarditis had been extreme sufficient to require hospitalization.
In addition they concluded that wholesome boys have a “significantly greater” probability of being hospitalized with myocarditis post-jab than they’re of requiring hospitalization for COVID-19.
Based on McCullough, the FDA has heard these information twice in 2021 and by no means disputed them. But they’ve proceeded with suggestions to provide the COVID jab to anybody with a pulse over the age of 5. It’s simply surprising. Traditionally, as a rule, we’ve by no means given medicine to folks once they’re extra more likely to hurt than present a profit.
What Hoeg et. al.10 confirmed is that circumstances of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally have an effect on boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis studies are males, and 85% of studies occurred after the second dose. Based on Hoeg et. al.:11
“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] amongst boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence amongst boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs amongst ladies was 13 per million in each age teams.
The incidence of CAEs was significantly decrease after the primary dose throughout all age and intercourse teams. Median peak troponin was 5.2 ng/mL amongst boys aged 12-15 years, 11.6 ng/mL amongst boys aged 16-17 years, 0.8 ng/mL amongst ladies aged 12-15 years, and seven.3 ng/mL amongst ladies aged 16-17 years.”
Troponin Ranges Reveal Large Coronary heart Injury
Troponin is a protein that helps regulate contractions of your coronary heart and skeletal muscle groups. It’s a biomarker for coronary heart injury, as your coronary heart releases troponin in response to an damage. Elevated troponin is used to evaluate whether or not you’ve had a coronary heart assault, for instance.
Regular troponin ranges are almost undetectable, so even small will increase can point out coronary heart injury. A stage above 0.4 ng/mL is often indicative of a coronary heart assault and something between 0.04 ng/mL and 0.4 ng/mL signifies there’s some sort of downside with the center.12
So, the sky excessive post-jab troponin ranges in these adolescent boys is something however inconsequential. It could completely be life-threatening. Myocarditis can lead to sudden demise, as illustrated in an October 2021 case report13 from Korea, the place the demise of a 22-year-old man from acute myocarditis was causally linked to the Pfizer shot.
“Certainly, it’ll kill youngsters,” McCullough says. Even when not acutely deadly, myocarditis can considerably decrease your life expectancy. Traditionally, the three- to five-year survival charge for myocarditis has ranged from 56% to 83%.14 Which means a sure share don’t make it previous 5 years as a result of their coronary heart is just too broken.
McCullough and Rose have additionally tried to publish an evaluation on this subject. They submitted a paper15 on myocarditis circumstances in VAERS following the COVID jabs to the journal Present Issues in Cardiology. However after initially accepting the paper, the journal abruptly modified its thoughts.
You may nonetheless discover the pre-proof on Rose’s web site although. What they present is that post-jab myocarditis is inversely correlated to age, so the chance will get greater the youthful you might be. They too discovered there’s a dose-dependent danger, with boys having a six-fold larger danger of myocarditis following the second dose.
Mortality in Adolescents Is Skyrocketing
McCullough’s assertion that the shot will kill some kids can also be beginning to present in statistics. British information, for instance, exhibits deaths amongst youngsters have spiked since that age group turned eligible for the COVID pictures.16
Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths had been reported amongst 15- to 19-year-olds. Throughout that very same time interval in 2021, 217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s a rise of 47%, which has but to be defined.
Deaths from COVID-19 additionally went up amongst 15- to 19-year-olds after the pictures had been rolled out. Important issues have been raised concerning the risk that COVID jabs may worsen COVID-19 illness through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).17 Is that what’s happening right here? As reported by The Exposé, which performed the investigation:18
“Correlation doesn’t equal causation, however this can be very regarding to see that deaths have elevated by 47% amongst teenagers over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have additionally elevated amongst this age group since they began receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it’s maybe one coincidence too far.”
COVID Jabs Double Danger of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Other than troponin ranges, researchers have additionally discovered Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 pictures dramatically enhance different biomarkers related to thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and different vascular occasions following injection.19
Individuals who had acquired two doses of the mRNA jab greater than doubled their five-year danger of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the researchers discovered, driving it from a mean of 11% to 25%. ACS is an umbrella time period that features not solely coronary heart assaults, but additionally a spread of different situations involving abruptly diminished blood movement to your coronary heart.
In Months, the Jabs’ Effectiveness Wanes to Zero
As ought to be evident by now, there are vital dangers to those COVID pictures. However what concerning the profit aspect of the equation? As famous by McCullough, whereas the pictures cut back the chance of demise from COVID-19, the profit is vanishingly small.
A variety of papers have been revealed calculating absolutely the danger discount of the pictures, exhibiting the 4 obtainable COVID jabs within the U.S. present an absolute danger discount between simply 0.7% and 1.3%.20,21
McCullough goes on to quote a December 1, 2021, New England Journal of Medication examine22 that in contrast the effectiveness of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections amongst hospitalized veterans. Right here too, they discovered that the pictures had an effectiveness of lower than 1% in opposition to all COVID-19 occasions, over the course of six months.
As of the top of October 2021, we had 22 research exhibiting the pictures’ efficacy in opposition to all variants quickly wane over the course of three to 6 months, finally hitting zero.
For instance, a Swedish examine23 revealed October 25, 2021, checked out information from 842,974 pairs, the place every one that had acquired two COVID jabs was paired and in contrast in opposition to an unvaccinated particular person, to see if the vaccinated had fewer symptomatic circumstances and hospitalizations.
Early on, the double-jabbed appeared to have respectable safety, however that rapidly modified. The Pfizer jab went from 92% effectiveness at Day 15 via 30, to 47% at Day 121 via 180, and 0 from Day 201 onward. The Moderna shot had an analogous trajectory, being estimated at 59% from Day 181 onward.
The AstraZeneca injection had a decrease effectiveness out of the gate, waned quicker than the mRNA pictures, and had no detectable effectiveness as of Day 121. All of the whereas, hundreds of thousands of Individuals have already had COVID24 and have pure immunity that doesn’t wane on this method.
“Vaccines aren’t viable if they will’t final a yr!” McCullough exclaims. “The minimal standards to simply accept a vaccine … is 50% protection and it should final one yr. These [COVID shots] aren’t chopping it. None of them are viable to be industrial merchandise.”
The COVID-Jabbed Are Simply as Infectious because the Unvaccinated
COVID jab mandates are much more irrational while you bear in mind the truth that they don’t stop you from being contaminated, and research have repeatedly proven that when you’re contaminated, you’ve the identical or greater viral load as unvaccinated people. What meaning is you’re simply as infectious as an unvaccinated particular person.
What’s extra, as famous in a letter25 to the editor of The New England Journal of Medication, the pictures even have solely minor affect on viral clearance. In case you get the COVID shot and are available down with COVID, you could be sick for a day or so lower than somebody who’s unvaccinated.
We Should Deal with COVID Sufferers Early
McCullough closes out his presentation going over the all-important subject of early therapy. It is advisable deal with COVID early and aggressively. You additionally have to hit it from a number of sides. No single drug can successfully deal with all features of this an infection (though the Omicron variant doesn’t seem to have any of the blood clotting and low oxygen points related to the earliest strains).
Only a few folks want die from COVID so long as they get acceptable therapy early sufficient. The truth that our well being authorities are to today refusing to acknowledge profitable therapy protocols is nothing wanting against the law.
If you wish to reside, and if you would like your loved ones and pals to reside, you’d be sensible to disregard the CDC’s and FDA’s advice to attend till you possibly can’t breathe after which go to the hospital, the place they’ll offer you poisonous remdesivir and deadly air flow. As a substitute, arm your self with a number of early therapy protocols and be sure you have the fundamentals in your drugs cupboard. Protocols you should utilize embody:
- The Entrance Line COVID-19 Important Care Alliance’s (FLCCC’s) prevention and early at-home therapy protocol. In addition they have an in-hospital protocol and long-term administration steering for long-haul COVID-19 syndrome. You will discover an inventory of docs who can prescribe ivermectin and different mandatory medicines on the FLCCC web site
- The AAPS protocol
- Tess Laurie’s World Council for Well being protocol
- America’s Frontline Medical doctors
I reviewed all of those protocols and consider the FLCCC’s is the simplest and best. I’ve posted a abstract of it beneath. Nonetheless, I’ve altered among the suggestions. Particularly, I like to recommend:
Reducing zinc dose from 100 mg to 50 mg elemental zinc, however just for three days, then lower to fifteen mg elemental zinc.
Growing quercetin from 250 mg to 500 mg.
Add NAC to 500 mg per day.
When utilizing vitamin C, I like to recommend liposomal vitamin C, 1,000 to 2,000 mg, 4 to 6 occasions per day.
When utilizing honey, be certain it’s uncooked, not regular honey from the grocery retailer. Uncooked honey may be obtained on-line or at a well being meals retailer.
Add fibrinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, serrapeptidase or nattokinase, two to 4 tablets, two to 3 occasions a day, on an empty abdomen (one hour earlier than or two hours after a meal). This can assist break down any microclots and can be utilized in lieu of aspirin.
I’ve additionally added a few therapies that they’ve but to incorporate:
- Nebulized hydrogen peroxide — Nebulize 5 ml of 0.1% peroxide dissolved in 0.9% regular saline each hour or two. It’s finest to make use of a nebulizer that plugs into the wall, as these are more practical than battery operated ones.
- Intravenous ozone administered by a skilled ozone doctor.