Tuesday, January 18, 2022
HomeHealthBombshell Admission — The COVID Assessments Don’t Work

Bombshell Admission — The COVID Assessments Don’t Work


From the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, the PCR take a look at has been a supply of unrelenting controversy, with consultants repeatedly mentioning that it’s not a sound diagnostic and produces inordinate quantities of false positives.

Importantly, a PCR take a look at can not distinguish between “dwell” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles. That is why it can’t be used as a diagnostic device. As defined by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Docs for Catastrophe Preparedness1 lecture, media and public well being officers seem to have purposefully conflated “instances” or constructive assessments with the precise sickness with a purpose to create the looks of a pandemic.

Moreover, a PCR take a look at can not affirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for scientific signs because the take a look at can not rule out illnesses brought on by different bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR take a look at, Kary Mullis, who gained a Nobel Prize for his work, explains this within the video above.

Virtually universally, well being authorities have additionally instructed labs to make use of excessively excessive cycle thresholds (CTs) — i.e., the variety of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — thereby making certain a most of false positives.

From the beginning, consultants famous {that a} CT over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable,2,3,4 but the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention beneficial working PCR assessments at a CT of 40,5 and the World Well being Group beneficial a CT of 45.

The pandemic of false positives was then utilized by world governments to implement pandemic countermeasures which have destroyed the worldwide economic system, ruined numerous lives, decimated the schooling of a complete technology and stripped us of fundamental human rights and freedoms.

Repeatedly, the objective put up for ending the pandemic theatre has been moved, and the justifications for persevering with the life-destroying countermeasures have turn out to be more and more laughable. The fearmongering over Omicron, for instance, makes no rational sense primarily based on the information obtainable, which exhibits the variant is among the many mildest to this point, and much much less more likely to infect and injury the lungs.6

CDC Cuts Isolation Suggestion in Half

Within the final days of December 2021, the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention issued yet one more illogical protocol change.7 Individuals who take a look at constructive for SARS-CoV-2, or have recognized publicity, however stay asymptomatic, now solely have to isolate for 5 days relatively than the earlier 10, however ought to put on a masks for an additional 5 days when at work or in public. Additionally, they don’t have to get retested on the finish of their quarantine. The said purpose? As a result of:

  1. Nearly all of viral transmission (85% to 90%8) happens within the first day or two earlier than symptom onset, and two to a few days after symptom onset9
  2. The PCR take a look at can stay constructive for as much as 12 weeks after you’ve recovered from the an infection10,11

How is it that the CDC didn’t understand till now that the PCR take a look at was choosing up lifeless viral particles for 3 months after an infection? The information that the take a look at, a) was far too delicate, and b) couldn’t establish energetic an infection, had been criticisms from the beginning. What the CDC’s belated admission means is that, for the previous two years, People have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation — maybe weeks — ready for a unfavourable take a look at.

In a December 30, 2021, look on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to questions in regards to the up to date CDC steerage. CDC director Rochelle Walensky additionally tried to make sense of the brand new steerage in a December 29, 2021, ABC Information interview (see movies above).12

Neither of them provided any rationalization as for why the CDC didn’t change the foundations sooner, and solely now determined that protecting noninfectious individuals in isolation for days and weeks on finish may not be so good in any case.

Walensky did make a relatively telling touch upon CNN, although, when requested in regards to the reasoning behind the shortened isolation steerage. “It actually had rather a lot to do with what we thought individuals would have the ability to tolerate,” she mentioned.13 Some have understandably translated that as “how a lot tyranny we thought individuals would have the ability to tolerate.”14

Differing Guidelines for Well being Care Staff

The CDC has not given up on making the steerage as complicated as doable although. December 23, 2021, additionally they up to date steerage for well being care staff,15 stating that “Well being care staff with COVID-19 who’re asymptomatic can return to work after seven days with a unfavourable take a look at, and that isolation time could be minimize additional if there are staffing shortages.”16

In his MSNBC interview, Fauci was requested why well being care staff are being handled otherwise, having to isolate for seven days relatively than 5, and nonetheless must get a unfavourable take a look at, when the take a look at can falsely stay constructive for as much as 12 weeks? What information helps this, and is it publicly obtainable?

Based on Fauci, the information to help this distinction “is inner to the CDC,” however actually, there’s “no particular information” to again it up, he provides. The CDC merely made “a judgment name.”

Double-Jabbed Handled the Identical as Unvaccinated

The CDC’s up to date steerage additionally places those that have acquired two doses of the COVID shot in the identical class because the unvaccinated, so on the subject of isolating after publicity, they must observe the identical guidelines, whereas those that have acquired a booster shot observe a special set of pointers. As defined by the CDC:17

“For people who find themselves unvaccinated or are greater than six months out from their second mRNA dose (or greater than 2 months after the J&J vaccine) and never but boosted, CDC now recommends quarantine for five days adopted by strict masks use for an extra 5 days.

Alternatively, if a 5-day quarantine shouldn’t be possible, it’s crucial that an uncovered particular person put on a well-fitting masks always when round others for 10 days after publicity. People who’ve acquired their booster shot don’t have to quarantine following an publicity, however ought to put on a masks for 10 days after the publicity.

For all these uncovered, finest apply would additionally embody a take a look at for SARS-CoV-2 at day 5 after publicity. If signs happen, people ought to instantly quarantine till a unfavourable take a look at confirms signs are usually not attributable to COVID-19.”

Fauci defended the choice to deal with the double-jabbed as in the event that they’re unvaccinated saying that those that have acquired a booster shot have far higher safety towards the Omicron variant, in comparison with those that have solely acquired one or two doses.

“Once you’re contaminated, you’re contaminated,” Fauci mentioned, and it doesn’t matter whether or not you’re vaccinated or not. The viral load is identical, so the chance of spreading the an infection is identical. Those that have been boosted are much less more likely to be contaminated or carry a big viral load, therefore they don’t have to isolate.

PCR Can’t Inform You Something About Contagiousness

Fauci was additionally requested about how one can measure contagiousness. If the PCR can register constructive for 12 weeks after an an infection, it could’t be a dependable indicator of infectiousness. This was exactly the purpose that Mullis, inventor of the PCR take a look at, tried to make within the video on the prime with respect to PCR and HIV.

So, how can we inform if we’re infectious or not? Fauci confirmed that the PCR can solely let you know there’s a presence or absence of viral fragments, not whether or not it’s an energetic an infection, or whether or not you’re truly infectious. He didn’t, nevertheless, present a solution to the query as to how one can measure contagiousness.

Fast Take a look at Doesn’t Decide Up Omicron

One more confounding issue on this mess is that the fast take a look at apparently doesn’t choose up Omicron very nicely.18 Your viral load must be very excessive on the time of testing to ensure that the fast take a look at to acknowledge it.

This admission got here inside days of president Biden’s announcement that the federal authorities will distribute half a billion free fast assessments to properties across the nation in 2022.19

It looks like a waste of sources, seeing how Omicron is beginning to take over, however who is aware of, possibly it should choose up the widespread chilly as a substitute, permitting the “case” rely to stay excessive sufficient to maintain the charade going.

What’s the Actual Loss of life Depend?

The CDC’s belated admission that the PCR take a look at can’t establish energetic an infection raises one other query: What does this imply for many who died with a constructive take a look at? Did they really have an energetic an infection? If not, ought to they’ve been designated as COVID deaths?

The plain reply to the final two questions is, in fact, no. The overwhelming majority had been seemingly false positives, and the actual demise toll from COVID-19 significantly decrease than we’re led to consider. The CDC undoubtedly knew this all alongside, seeing how they’ve been relentlessly criticized for his or her suggestion to run the PCR at a CT of 40. They’re making an attempt to faux that they only realized this, however that’s merely not plausible.



RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments